Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!
Rolling Stones quotes: Mick Jagger about rock music (1981)
Mick Jagger’s 1981 reflections reveal a rarely seen side of The Rolling Stones icon: a seasoned observer of rock, aware of its patterns and repetitions. While younger bands churn out nightly shows, Jagger recognizes that many acts recycle what came before, from The Specials to The Selecter, linking even new sounds to music he saw in 1959. Yet he appreciates true innovation, praising Pink Floyd while admitting his own curiosity for rock has waned. This candid perspective shows how a rock legend balances respect, critique, and personal evolution, offering fans a fresh lens on the music he helped define.
“I don’t feel connected with bands like the Clash, the bands that still play every night. I can only see them as repeats of everything that happened before. I think it’s a bit unfortunate, too, but I think that no one would disagree with me. Most musicians in fact do agree with me. Bands like The Selecter and The Specials, which are good bands, are repeats too. I mean, I saw bands like that in 1959. It’s the same old thing done slightly differently. I like some of the shows I’ve seen. I liked the Pink Floyd show – better, anyway, than Elvis Costello’s. But I haven’t been interested in rock for years – I mean interested in it in the way of wanting to talk about it. It’s not really the 100% of everything I’m interested in. I guess, I never have been.”
In 1981 Mick Jagger reflected on his complex relationship with rock music, revealing a mix of respect, disinterest, and historical awareness. Unlike younger bands that tour relentlessly, Jagger sees many acts as mere repetitions of what came before—reinventions of familiar formulas rather than new creative breakthroughs. His admiration is selective, noting Pink Floyd’s innovation while dismissing others like Elvis Costello. More than critique, Jagger’s words reveal a personal evolution: rock no longer commands the same obsessive attention it once did. It is not the centerpiece of his life, but a genre he respects, observes, and understands in the broader tapestry of music history.
Observing Repetition and Innovation
Jagger’s insight highlights the tension between originality and repetition in music. Even well-regarded bands, in his view, often recycle familiar motifs, whether through sound, style, or stage performance. By comparing contemporary acts to those he saw decades earlier, he frames rock as a cyclical art form, one that thrives on reinvention yet risks predictability. This perspective reflects not cynicism but a musician’s nuanced understanding: innovation exists, but it must be measured against a long lineage of influences.
Personal Evolution in Musical Taste
Beyond critique, Jagger candidly admits his shifting engagement with rock. Once a passionate fan and participant, he no longer feels compelled to dissect every emerging act or debate trends. Instead, he focuses on what captivates him—moments of genuine creativity that transcend routine. This evolution illustrates how even icons of rock eventually redefine their relationship with the very culture they helped shape, valuing depth and originality over constant consumption or spectacle.
Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here:
Cookie Policy
Subscribe to the Stones Data newsletter and get all daily posts delivered to you for free. Everybody got to go! *Support the site and help me keep sharing great content. Thanks in advance!
