Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!
Rolling Stones Songs: Monkey Man
Well, I hope we’re not too messianic, or a trifle too satanic/ We love to play the blues…
Original title: Positano Grande Written by: Jagger/Richard Recorded: Olympic Sound Studios, London, England, Apr. 17-22, June 5-July 3 1969 *Data taken from Martin Elliott’s book THE ROLLING STONES COMPLETE RECORDING SESSIONS 1962-2012
Mick Jagger: vocals Keith Richards: guitar, backing vocals Bill Wyman: bass, vibes Charlie Watts: drums Guest musicians: Nicky Hopkins (piano), Jimmy Miller (tambourine)
Monkey Man arrives on Let It Bleed like a scene already in progress, noisy, chaotic, and slightly unhinged. It doesn’t bother to explain itself; instead, it drops the listener into a world where identity feels unstable and reputation has become performance. By 1969, the Rolling Stones were no longer just a band reacting to fame—they were actively wrestling with the caricatures imposed on them. This song captures that tension perfectly. It feels cinematic, aggressive, and deliberately uncomfortable, as if Jagger is both inhabiting and mocking the role assigned to him. The music surges forward with a sense of menace, while the lyrics juggle sarcasm, self-awareness, and theatrical excess. Rather than offering confession or clarity, Monkey Man thrives on exaggeration and contradiction. It’s a portrait painted with distortion, where the singer becomes a creature shaped by gossip, expectation, and spectacle, snarling back at the world that insists on labeling him.
Origins and inspiration
The roots of Monkey Man stretch beyond London and into southern Italy, where Mick Jagger and Keith Richards were immersed in a different cultural atmosphere altogether. Written during their time on the Amalfi Coast, the song was initially known as Positano Grande, a title that hints at its cinematic ambitions. One of its key inspirations was Italian pop artist Mario Schifano, whose life blurred the boundaries between art, excess, and provocation. Schifano’s brief but intense post-Jagger relationship with Marianne Faithfull added another layer of resonance, folding personal displacement into artistic fascination. Rather than functioning as a straightforward tribute, the song absorbs this world of chaos and reinvention, translating it into sound. The result is not biography but mood: restless, stylized, and slightly surreal. The Stones weren’t documenting events so much as channeling an energy, using Schifano’s orbit as a catalyst for something more symbolic and performative.
Lyrics as performance
Lyrically Monkey Man operates less as confession and more as satire. Jagger presents himself as a grotesque figure, battered by rumor and ridicule, yet fully aware of the absurdity of the image. The song toys with the idea of decadence without fully embracing it, constantly undercutting its own provocations. Lines that appear outrageous are quickly followed by ironic reversals, creating a tone that feels playful and defensive at the same time. There’s also a clear self-referential streak, with nods to the Stones’ recent past and public controversies woven directly into the text. Rather than responding earnestly to critics or moralists, Jagger exaggerates their accusations until they collapse under their own weight. This approach separates him from darker chroniclers of excess; the danger is present, but it’s filtered through theatrical distance. The “monkey” becomes a mask—one that allows commentary without vulnerability.
Sound and studio tension
Musically the track stands apart from earlier Stones recordings, drawing heavily from the language of film soundtracks. The extended introduction establishes suspense through repetition and texture rather than melody, creating a sense of unease before the vocals even begin. Despite technical frustrations during the recording sessions, the finished production feels deliberate and immersive. The rhythm locks into a hypnotic groove, while layered instrumentation gives the song its shifting emotional weight. Bill Wyman’s contributions go beyond the expected, reinforcing the track’s atmosphere with subtle color and movement. Charlie Watts anchors everything with precision, keeping the chaos controlled. As the song progresses, the sound tightens and hardens, mirroring Jagger’s increasingly confrontational delivery. Keith Richards injects grit and urgency into the arrangement, though the overall effect favors mood over virtuosity. The track breathes, expands, and contracts, using dynamics as storytelling tools rather than decoration.
Afterlife and meaning
Monkey Man has aged not as a relic of scandal but as a study in persona. Its inclusion in Goodfellas decades later feels almost inevitable, given its cinematic structure and moral ambiguity. Like much of the Stones’ late-’60s work, it resists ideological clarity, preferring character over conviction. While the era was filled with artists presenting their inner truths, the Stones chose instead to dramatize themselves, stepping into exaggerated roles rather than speaking plainly. In that sense, Monkey Man is not about rebellion or politics, but about survival within spectacle. It presents the band as actors navigating a hostile stage, aware of the audience but never fully surrendering to it. The song endures because it refuses sincerity as a selling point, opting instead for sharp observation and controlled chaos. What remains is a vivid snapshot of a band turning scrutiny into art.
Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!
