Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!
Rolling Stones Songs: Love in Vain (1969)
When the train left the station/ It had two lights on behind…
More about The Rolling Stones’ take on Love in Vain
*By Marcelo Sonaglioni
When the Stones Met Robert Johnson
Long before Robert Johnson’s name became shorthand for crossroads, devils, and destiny, he existed on the margins of popular awareness. In the late 1960s, his music circulated mostly among musicians, collectors, and obsessive listeners digging through imported blues records. For many rock fans, his presence was indirect, filtered through covers rather than originals. That began to shift when the Rolling Stones turned their attention to Love in Vainwhile shaping Let It Bleed in 1969. Encouraged by Marianne Faithfull, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards returned to Johnson’s spare, heartbreaking song and reimagined it without turning it into a museum piece. What emerged was neither imitation nor nostalgia. Instead, the Stones treated the song as living material, stretching a fragile Delta blues lament into something that felt both older and newly exposed. In doing so, they helped move Johnson from the footnotes of blues history into the center of rock’s evolving conversation with its roots.
A Blues Legend’s Fingerprints on Rock
Johnson’s Love in Vain Blues was recorded in 1937 during his final recording session, a stark performance built only from voice and finger-style acoustic guitar. The song’s emotional weight—often described as devastatingly bleak—rests on its restraint, its sense of loss unfolding quietly rather than theatrically. When it appeared in 1939 as the last of Johnson’s original 78 rpm releases, it marked an end point to a brief but influential recording life. Keith Richards first encountered Johnson’s work through King of the Delta Blues Singers, an album passed along by Brian Jones and revered by musicians such as Bob Dylan and Jimmy Page. That record opened a door. Johnson’s phrasing, timing, and emotional economy seeped into Richards’ musical vocabulary, shaping his understanding of what the blues could communicate with minimal means. By the time the Stones approached Love in Vain Johnson’s influence was already embedded in their instincts, even before they touched the song itself.
When the Stones Met Robert Johnson
The Stones first performed Love in Vain live at Hyde Park on July 5, 1969, during the concert that introduced Mick Taylor as their new guitarist. That performance signaled just how close to the source the band was willing to go. Critic Richie Unterberger later described the studio version as “as close to the roots of acoustic down-home blues as the Stones ever got,” a telling assessment for a band often associated with swagger and amplification. Rather than recreating Johnson’s stark despair, the Stones reshaped the song with a distinctly country-leaning feel, softening its bleakness without draining its sorrow. Richards resisted copying the original structure, choosing instead to widen its emotional space. With Brian Jones unavailable due to his worsening drug problems, Ry Cooder was brought in to play mandolin, adding a fragile, rural texture that subtly shifted the song’s mood. The result balanced clarity and grit, honoring Johnson’s spirit while letting the Stones’ own sensibility breathe.
Keith Richards: “It is such a beautiful song. Mick and I both loved it and at the time I was working and playing around with Gram Parsons, and I started searching around for a different way to present it, because if we were going to record it there was no point in trying to copy the Robert Johnson Style or version. So I sat around playing it in all kinds of different ways and Styles. We took it a little bit more country, a little more formalised and Mick felt comfortable with that. But in a way it was just like – we’ve got to do this song, one way or another. Because it was just so beautiful; the title, the lyrics, the ideas, the rhyme, just everything about it”.
Mick: “We changed the arrangement quite a lot from Robert Johnson’s. We put in extra chords that aren’t there on the Johnson version. Made it more country. And that’s another strange song, because it’s very poignant. Robert Johnson was a wonderful lyric writer, and his songs are quite often about love, but they’re desolate”
Legacy in a Suitcase
The Stones returned to Love in Vain again on Get Yer Ya-Ya’s Out!, this time stripping away the mandolin and leaning into a rawer, more exposed live arrangement. Without ornament, the song carried a different weight, closer in tension if not in tone to Johnson’s original recording. Myths surrounding Johnson—especially tales of a Faustian bargain—have often overshadowed the practical reality of his influence. For the Stones, that influence was never mystical; it was musical, emotional, and direct. Love in Vain traveled with them from studio to stage, from acoustic radio sessions to large audiences, much like the battered suitcase in Johnson’s lyrics. In carrying the song forward, the Stones helped ensure that Johnson’s voice did not remain locked in the shellac grooves of prewar blues. Instead, it moved through decades, crossing genres and generations, quietly reshaping rock’s understanding of where its deepest feelings began.
Keith Richards (1995): “Sometimes I wonder… myself (about how we developed that arrangement). I don’t know! (laughs) We only knew the Robert Johnson version. At the time we were kicking it around, I was into country music, old white country music, ’20s and ’30s stuff, and white gospel. Somewhere I crossed over into this more classical mode. Sometimes things just happen. We were sitting in the studio, saying, Let’s do Love in Vain by Robert Johnson. Then I’m trying to figure out some nuances and chords, and I start to play it in a totally different fashion. Everybody joins in and goes, Yeah, and suddenly you’ve got your own stamp on it. I certainly wasn’t going to be able to top Robert Johnson’s guitar playing.”
Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!
