Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!

Rolling Stones on video: 50 Years TV report

Interviews with Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, conducted by Will Gompertz at Somerset House in London, aired on BBC Breakfast on July 11, 2012.

*Click for MORE STONES ON VIDEO

A conversation at the halfway mark of a century

On a July morning in 2012, Somerset House became an unlikely pause point in the long forward motion of The Rolling Stones. Interviewed by Will Gompertz for BBC Breakfast, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards found themselves talking not about the next gig or the next record, but about time itself. With the band’s 50th anniversary looming, the moment invited reflection without demanding sentimentality. The setting helped: formal yet open, historic without being stiff.

Jagger and Richards responded in kind, mixing dry humor with a calm awareness of what five decades together actually meant. There was no victory speech, no tidy summing-up of a career. Instead, the exchange felt conversational, almost casual, as if longevity were simply another strange circumstance to navigate. What emerged wasn’t nostalgia, but perspective—two musicians acknowledging distance traveled while remaining firmly rooted in the present tense.

Chemistry, friction and shared memory

One of the interview’s quiet strengths lay in how easily the old dynamic resurfaced. Gompertz’s questions nudged the Glimmer Twins into familiar territory: glances, interruptions, gentle digs, and unspoken understanding. Their chemistry didn’t need explanation; it played out naturally in tone and timing. References to the past surfaced not as rehearsed anecdotes, but as shared memories still alive between them. Just as important were the gaps—moments where neither felt the need to over-explain or dramatize history. The conversation touched on endurance and creativity, but never as abstract concepts. Survival in rock and roll, for Jagger and Richards, seemed less about strategy than instinct: knowing when to push forward and when to let things sit. The ease between them suggested that whatever conflicts had defined earlier chapters were no longer the point. What mattered was continuity—the fact that, against expectation, the partnership still functioned.

Legacy without embalming

Perhaps the most striking aspect of the interviews was what they refused to become. This was not a commemorative exercise, nor a soft-focus look backward. Even with half a century behind them, the Stones were presented not as cultural artifacts, but as an active force still shaping its own narrative. Gompertz framed the discussion around creativity and relevance, and the answers resisted finality. Jagger spoke with curiosity rather than closure; Richards with grounded confidence instead of mythmaking.

The future was left deliberately open. In that sense, the interviews captured something essential about The Rolling Stones’ identity. Legacy existed, but it wasn’t something to sit inside—it was something to carry while moving on. By avoiding nostalgia, the conversation reinforced a simple truth: the Stones were still a band, not a monument. Comfortable in their history, yes—but unmistakably alive to the moment they were standing in.

Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!

COPYRIGHT © ROLLING STONES DATA
ALL INFORMATION ON THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHT OF ROLLING STONES DATA. ALL CONTENT BY MARCELO SONAGLIONI.
ALL SETLISTS AND TICKET STUBS TAKEN FROM THE COMPLETE WORKS OF THE ROLLING STONES. 
WHEN USING INFORMATION FROM ROLLING STONES DATA (ONLINE OR PRINTED) PLEASE REFER TO ITS SOURCE DETAILING THE WEBSITE NAME. THANK YOU.