Like what you see? Help keep it going! This ad-free site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh content coming your way every day. Thank you!
Rolling Stones songs: Think
And think back, back a little bit. baby/ Back, back alright…
Written by: Jagger/Richard
Recorded: RCA Studios, Hollywood, USA, Dec. 8-10 1965
Mick Jagger: vocals
Keith Richards: guitar, backing vocals
Brian Jones: guitar
Bill Wyman: bass
Charlie Watts: drums
*Click for MORE ROLLING STONES SONGS 1962-PRESENT
More about Think by The Rolling Stones
*By Marcelo Sonaglioni

A Second Look at a Song That Cuts Deep
Long before Think became an overlooked entry in the Rolling Stonesโ 1966 arsenal, its emotional DNA was already taking shape in Mick Jaggerโs ongoing duel with the ghosts of past relationships. The song is built around a wounded narrator confronting a former lover after a long separation, demanding maturity while hurling bitter truthsโ”Take a look and you will find / Youโre gettinโ old before your time”. Itโs not just an accusation; itโs a carefully sharpened blade, forged in the aftermath of promises broken and affection soured. Whether inspired by Chrissie Shrimpton or echoes of other romantic upheavals, the track reveals Jaggerโs fascination with emotional reckoning long before the Stones were fully acknowledged as masters of melodrama. But beneath its barbed lyrics lies a broader story: Think is the kind of song whose real weight emerges only when placed within the shifting landscape of mid-sixties rock, where the Stones were experimenting, testing boundaries, and beginning to understand how far their musical chemistry could take them.
A Pop Song That Was Anything but Soft
Among the lesser-known tracks on Aftermath, โThinkโ remains one of the most distinctive, balancing a pop-leaning structure with the rougher, R&B-grounded textures that defined the Stonesโ developing voice. While it never reached the legendary status of Motherโs Little Helper, Paint It Black or Lady Jane, it stands out for its interlocking guitar riffs that open the song with ominous tensionโmuch like the approach used on 19th Nervous Breakdown. Yet what really jolted contemporary listeners was the use of fuzz bass, a sound still novel in 1966 and rarely deployed with such prominence. The chorus, with its striking stop-and-start rhythmic shift, feels like the musical embodiment of accusation, matching Jaggerโs pointed delivery as he interrogates the wreckage of a deteriorated relationship. The track also leans more heavily on vocal harmonies than the typical Stones number, giving it a pop sheen without sacrificing its bite.
Behind the Sound: A Studio Experiment That Didnโt Fully Ignite
Despite its tightly constructed framework, Think never quite ascended to the level of the Stonesโ strongest material from the period, in part because its energy feels slightly restrained. The production, however, is a fascinating snapshot of the bandโs sonic evolution. Keith Richards dusts off the Maestro Fuzz-Tone that had electrified (I Canโt Get No) Satisfaction, using it here not as a bombastic effect but as a stand-in for the horn arrangements he often heard in his head. Alongside the fuzzed lines, Keith weaves in 6-string acoustic guitarโits opening notes later mirrored by George Harrisonโs Wah-Wahโwhile also taking the songโs brief lead break. Brian Jones holds down the rhythm on his Gibson Firebird, Bill Wyman threads an agile bassline through the arrangement, and Charlie Watts delivers a grounded, unflashy groove on his Ludwig kit. Jaggerโs performance glides between pop clarity and R&B phrasing, helped by Keithโs harmonies. Everything works; yet everything stops just short of greatness.
A Song Reimagined: Chris Farloweโs Bid for a Hit
In the mid-sixties, the Stones werenโt just writing for themselves; they were also feeding songs to other artists, and Think became one of their more notable handoffs. Chris Farloweโalready admired within the British R&B circuitโwas captivated by the melody and asked Jagger, Richards, and Andrew Loog Oldham to produce his version. Released on January 2, 1966, it reached number 49 in the charts, climbing again to 37 the following month. Farloweโs interpretation was more flamboyant than the Stonesโ own later recording, featuring pronounced soul-rock elements and brass arrangements that amplified its dramatic tension. Despite its stronger pop ambition, the single stalled commercially, perhaps confirming why the Stones themselves seemed hesitant to push their own rendition as a major release. Still, Farloweโs version underlined the songโs adaptability, revealing a melodic backbone sturdy enough to support multiple stylistic identities.
The Collectorsโ Angle and a Legacy in the Shadows
For Stones completists, the story doesnโt end with official releases. A slightly remixed version of Think surfaced on the bootleg Necrophilia, featuring what sounds like an added horn or organ soloโan intriguing โwhat-ifโ peek into sonic directions the band might have explored. Although Think never secured a place among the Stonesโ iconic tracks, it offers a revealing cross-section of a group still sharpening its songwriting instincts and pushing its sonic palette. The songโs emotional coldness, musical experimentation, and chart-side detours all speak to a band on the verge of transformation. And while it sits in the long shadow cast by the giants of Aftermath, Think remains one of the most compelling glimpses into the moment when the Jagger-Richards partnership began the climb from promising to formidable.
Like what you see? Help keep it going! This site runs on the support of readers like you. Your donation helps cover costs and keeps fresh Rolling Stones content coming your way every day. Thank you!ย
COPYRIGHT ยฉ ROLLING STONES DATA
ALL INFORMATION ON THISย WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHT OF ROLLING STONES DATA. ALL CONTENT BY MARCELO SONAGLIONI.
ALL SETLISTS AND TICKET STUBS TAKEN FROM THE COMPLETE WORKS OF THE ROLLING STONES.ย
WHEN USING INFORMATION FROM ROLLING STONES DATA (ONLINE OR PRINTED) PLEASE REFER TO ITS SOURCE DETAILING THE WEBSITE NAME. THANK YOU.
Discover more from STONES DATA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Can You Hear the Music?











Stones Data on Substack
